Boil 'em, mash 'em, stick 'em in a RPG

The year was 2002. Peter Jackson was about to release the second instalment in the Lord of the Rings movie trilogy, EA had bagged the rights to the video game adaptations of the films and Vivendi was just about to release its own console adaptation, not of the New Line Cinema property, but adapted directly from the Tolkien-penned source material.

It is hardly a hot take to say that the motion picture trilogy is fantastic. The fellowship is perfectly cast, Howard Shore’s score stands up today as one of the greatest of all time, and each film efficiently serves Tolkien’s original work through the scope of their worldbuilding. Though even with a combined runtime just short of 12 hours (extended editions, of course), the films could never really capture the entirety of the world about which Tolkien had written.

This presented a considerable challenge for not only the filmmakers but also for video games developers, whether they were aping the films' treatment of the source or steering clear for rights reasons. Vivendi (publishing under its Black Label Games label) needed to make a game that would do Tolkien's world justice. While the bigger versions of The Lord of the Rings: Fellowship of the Ring on Xbox, Playstation 2, and PC took the conventional action-adventure route, some serious adaptation was required to fit the Game Boy Advance’s significantly reduced hardware capabilities. Vivendi needed a smaller style of game to fit Tolkien’s massive world, and — with developer Pocket Studios at the helm — settled on an RPG with turn-based battles.

There is no doubt that with the dominance of action gaming at the time, the team would not have hesitated to make a 'Lord of the Rings: Legolas' Archery Battle' FPS if they had the means. However, considering the prominence of role-playing and D&D in the fantasy landscape, and the success that the GBA would go on to have with titles such as Fire Emblem, Sword of Mana and (later) Final Fantasy VI Advance, the decision to go RPG for the portable game seems obvious today. A cast of nine heroes sent on a journey through a huge world rich with lore and battles? Of course, an RPG is the way to go! Turn-based combat could only serve to benefit this system further, showing off the unique skills and potential of each character. The heroes near enough present us with a skill card at various moments during the films for crying out loud: ‘We dwarves are dangerous over a short distance!’

And yet, looking back over the franchise’s console games on the 20th anniversary of Vivendi’s Fellowship of the Ring (the GBA and Xbox versions), we can’t help but ask, where are all the LOTR RPGs?

Perhaps the GBA game Vivendi ended up releasing soured developers of console titles on the idea. The RPG may seem to be the perfect format for the series on paper, but – as this writer found when attempting to personalise his GBA with biro in the early 2000s – a Game Boy is not paper.

Leaning (through necessity) into the source material, GBA's Fellowship of the Ring was supposed to provide a Tolkien fan’s interpretation which many felt the films did not capture. On this count, it failed. Full of bugs and with a combat system in which the player had to watch each of their party make the slow journey from starting position, to enemy, and back again before getting to make their next move, the game was, in simple Took terms, broken. (Check out the end of the video above to see what we mean).

But this is not to say that there weren’t plenty of good ideas in the GBA title. The turn-based combat is perfectly suited to a party of nine clearly defined heroes and the ability to upgrade characters’ stats is straight out of Tolkien’s fantasy wheelhouse – Mithril anyone?

Looking back 20 years, perhaps navigating the landscape of Lord of the Rings to create a great RPG on Game Boy Advance was going to be as difficult as a Hobbit’s trek through the snowy peaks of Caradhras. EA had the rights to the film-to-video game adaptations and it was taking a very different approach, with hack-and-slash style gameplay. A more accessible playstyle and explicit links to the big screen stories — not to mention a far better quality product across the board — meant EA’s Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (released the same year) and Lord of the Rings: Return of the King were far better critically and commercially received on both GBA and GameCube, promoting that real-time action-focused gameplay as the way to approach Middle Earth in video games.

The stickiness of this approach can still be felt today on consoles, with 2014's Middle Earth: Shadow of Mordor and 2017's Shadow of War continuing EA’s sword-swinging into Tolkien's world, with the innovative and intricate Nemesis system helping to set those games apart from more typical action-slashers. Heck, there’s even an argument to be made that the likes of Skyrim and Elden Ring continue this exploration-based model of fantasy gameplay, wearing their Middle Earth connections proudly on their chainmail-covered sleeves.

However, even considering its mainstream success with more action-focused games, EA itself couldn't resist the pull of the turn-based format, and released Lord of the Rings: The Third Age on GBA and GameCube in 2004, and the very similar Lord of the Rings: Tactics on PSP in 2005. As tactical RPGs, EA's two post-film releases substituted the exploration value for a more strategic model (see the video above). This meant that while the games may not have been completely tied to the film's narratives (you can play as the Witch King of Angmar in Helm's Deep, for example), it proved that the battles of Middle Earth are a dream coupling with the (S)RPG's penchant for planning, experimentation, and pummelling grotesque creatures.

EA's RPG efforts were better received than Vivendi's Fellowship, and capitalised on something which seemed obvious: Middle Earth is ripe with turn-based potential, tactical or otherwise.

Cast your elf eyes over the state of LOTR console gaming today and the post-Shadow of Mordor RPG drought is plain to see, though the time for one to be made has never been better. The genre has never been more popular, Lord of the Rings continues to be huge – thanks, Bezos – and turn-based combat has evolved well beyond the pitfalls of attack, *extended animation*, receive, *extended animation*, repeat. Fellowship's devs might have looked to Dragon Quest, or Final Fantasy, or EarthBound, or any number of classic '90s RPGs for pointers, but then we don't imagine Pocket Studios had much time or a Bezos-sized budget to work with.

Perhaps now that Embracer Group owns the rights to Lord of the Rings in its entirety *shivers* change could be on the horizon. It's true, seeing a huge IP such as Middle Earth being subsumed by a conglomeration structure isn't necessarily pleasant, and yet, as Gandalf so keenly notes, "It is not despair, for despair is only for those who see the end beyond all doubt. We do not." Perhaps opening up the rights of Middle Earth to Embracer's 127 games companies (according to Wikipedia's last count) will encourage the tides to change and shift away from EA's more risk-averse approach.

The model is already there if you look into the wider gaming world. Since the release of Pocket Studio's Fellowship, tactical gameplay has been applied to Middle Earth by the Cave Troll-carried bucketload, though they have steered away from consoles like a Nazgûl to water. Lord of the Rings: War, Journeys in Middle Earth and countless others have each continued The Third Age's tactical approach to the franchise on mobile, and Lord of the Rings: Online brings the open world aspect to PC in a full-on MMORPG.

Looking at the shards of Narsil, it is clear that there is a great sword in there somewhere, though in its current state you wouldn’t want to take it into battle. So, too, might we look on these other non-console titles alongside Vivendi’s old GBA Lord of the Rings: Fellowship of the Ring – all the pieces are there to make a fantastic Middle Earth RPG, all that is required is the skilled hand of an elven swordsmith (or game developer, whoever has the earliest availability) to reforge it into something new. And, preferably, available on Switch.

Just like Gandalf, peering over his scrolls in wizard-y ring revision, we could look to something like Live A Live as a prime example of what a Fellowship-inspired Middle Earth game could be in 2022. Those turn-based battles, using Live A Live's hybrid grid system, would be astonishing with members of the Fellowship. Wielding a sword and torch while fighting Nazgûl on Weathertop? Yes, please! And the HD-2D style could be the perfect way to reference the original game whilst getting rid of all of its flaws — if you were desperate to polish up an unloved game from 20 years ago, that is. Hey, remakes are all the rage, right?

But why not push this idea further? Frodo didn’t make it to the fires of Mount Doom by dreaming small, oh no, let’s think about the bigger picture here. What about a push into SRPG territory in which you play as King Theoden and control the field at the battle of Helm’s Deep? With the boom in mainstream tactical RPG production following the rejuvenating success of Fire Emblem: Awakening in the West, you would think that a Lord of the Rings tactics game would be a dead cert by now.

Alas, on consoles, they are few and far between. Be it down to Fellowship's failures or (more likely) Shadow of Mordor's success, the genre to which LOTR should be married has long been left on the bottom of a Middle Earth riverbed, waiting for an inquisitive hand to brush across it.

But what do you make of all this? Is Lord of the Rings in desperate need of an RPG makeover on console? Or would it make even more marvellous musou material? Need more LEGO LOTR?

Fill out the below polls with your thoughts and then leave a comment to share what you think the game(s) should look like!

(You can select up to 3 answers)

I would just take some nice ports of the Shadows of Mordor games

I was surprised by how all the answers I chose were the ones everyone else chose before I realized I was the first.😐 Also, I just unlocked a memory of my friend’s older brother playing these.

I enjoyed the hack and slash Gamecube entries based upon the film trilogy. Wouldn't mind a remaster that fleshes out Fellowship into more than a Two Towers tutorial section

The Third Age was a decent Final Fantasy X clone. I’d play a new turn based RPG.

I'd like to see the EA games from the Gamecube PS2 era re-released

Where's GC Return of the King on your related games list?

I remember playing the rts on XBox. After fortifying my erm...fort, my excitement soon melted away as my amassed forces shouted 'the Orcs are coming!!' and I scrolled down to see 2 orcs...one with a ladder. It was hilariously pathetic.

Imagine a Lord of the rings game made by from software, open world similar to elden ring.

Now that would sell millions.

I remember a Lord of the Rings RPG on SNES based on the 1978 animated movie. Unfortunately, like the movie, it only told the first half of the story and never received a follow up.

The GC LotR games were the best in the franchise (Two Towers, Return of the King, The Third Age) so remastering them would be cool but also in the case of The Third Age adding in the option to turn off random encounters would be cool. Playing BDSP after Sword/Shield gave me the impression random encounters in RPGs haven't aged particularly well.

My favourite one was actually war on the north. Perfect blend of hack and slash with RPG elements set through linear levels. Would love to see more of that.

I’d like to see another RTS game personally. Battle for middle earth I and II were so good.

An open world LotR game akin to BotW or Elden Ring, would be incredible.

A classic LotR RPG like Chrono Trigger would also be awesome.

A strategy game where you command the various factions would be sweet. although that might already be a thing?

And I'm always down for hack and slash style games too.

It's definitely a series that lends itself quite well the video game adaptations.

I would like to see handheld adaptations receive more love going forward. They are almost always ignored when it comes to re-releases when they are occasionally superior to or otherwise hold their own against the console adaptations (and are usually completely different games that just happen to share IP and/or story elements).

Dead in the water I hope.

I like Shadows of Mordor. Don't need anything else other than that type of hack and slash.

Fantasy is oversaturated in video games. A LotR RPG has little to nothing to say compared to all its Tolkien fantasy clones that have been popping up in popular media the last four decades.

Tired of it. Let the old man's work go dead please.

last one played was Lego, b4 that the GCN three. third age was great for the in depth places. the other 2 had the better combat so mix the two? as for Lego, The One Ring saga(only 3 or all 6 movies?) would be good.

Wait, what's Elliot Page doing in Lord of the Rings?

Does Amazon own full creative rights to all of Tolkein's works, including games and alternate media?

@Axecon The Tolkien Estate now known as middle earth enterprises owns the rights to Tolkien’s works and they used to be notoriously stingy with the IP but that is clearly no longer the case. I think amazon just acquired the rights to produce the show, but it’s possible they acquired merchandising rights too, i’m not really sure.

@Axecon IDK but the rights to Lord of Rings will expire in half of the world in 2023, that half includes giants like China and Canada. The other half will expire by 2033, so games will popup left and right very soon and there is nothing that the copyright owners can do about it.

If a Lord of the Rings turn based tactical RPG would be announced, I would slip right into an excitement coma.

would love to see a good lord of the rings game that includes elements from the first age to the third age with a level up system unlocking new skills,abilities,picking which stats you want up the most,big open world to explore,along with get to play as sauron or any other villain character besides the good guys.

I used to be a LotR super geek as i had read all the books numerous times. I have never played a decent game based on the ip. While i can’t summon the optimism to care, it doesn’t bother me that they keep trying. I’ll wager i’ll be long dead before they get it right. Ouija me if they do.

For as much as I’ve loved and read The Hobbit and the LOTR trilogy over the years, I never seem to come across any licensed games. The only one I own is on Switch: LOTR The Adventure Card Game. It’s actually a nice portrayal of the universe, with some gorgeous art. And while the gameplay isn’t as addictive as, say, Slay the Spire, it’s still a fun, quality deckbuilder.

I’d like to try the Shadow of Mordor games, though, if those were ported to Switch.

The only LotR game I attempted was the SNES game (I suppose that isn't the only pre-Peter Jackson game, is it?). Probably one of my least favorite action-RPGs on the console. Sorry, Interplay, Secret of Mana had you beat, and by almost a year on the market.

@Gamer_Griff Exactly why there was never a Vol. 2, because Vol. 1 did almost everything wrong. Awful graphics (for 1994, I don't know they'd even pass for a Genesis game ), awkward off-centered hitboxes, multiplayer mode seemed to require extra players to hold a button, not sure if there was a regular healing spot, PASSWORD SAVING (and not even a good system).

This GBA game had a really great soundtrack.

Make a LOTR game like Diablo for switch. With better customization.

There’s no shortage of its derivatives so I don’t think see the necessity.

The Third Age on GameCube is one of the finest RPGs of its generation. Imagine the mega-budget Final Fantasy approach applied to the world of the LOTR films. The GBA version is an unrelated game, so somehow this article overlooked the best LOTR game, which happens to be a traditional turn based RPG.

The issue with adapting Tolkien to the video game format is that what makes the Lord of the Rings emotionally moving (brotherhood, fellowship, faith, nature, courage in the face of insurmountable odds, etc.) are qualities not well-suited to being filtered through popular video game genres. Lord of the Rings at its heart is not about violence, action, and so on. There is certainly some room for the odd RPG or an open world style game, but realistically, there is not much for the IP to achieve within the format that hasn't already been done by the Two Towers, Return of the King, and The Third Age. Especially with how prevelant MTX, NFTs, and related technologies are becoming over time, none of which will ever be conducive to an experience Tolkien would have approved of (as if the horrific television series produced by Amazon of all companies weren't enough), it would be best to let the works stand on their own.

Something exploration heavy would be fantastic.

Please no more Shadow of Mordor. It's cool playing a Boromir simulator for a few minutes where you try to fight as some jackhole Orc shoots arrows. I'd much rather have something in the spirit of Fez where there's no combat and you're just a scholar exploring this beautiful world solving some magic riddles to gain knowledge.

But really there's never going to be a good way to put the original stories into a video game. Enjoy the movies and listen to Summoning instead.

As a long-time fan of Tolkien’s works, I’ve played pretty much every adaptation/interpretation so far. It’s been so long since there’s been much of anything in this universe in the gaming world, so I’d love some more attempts in pretty much any genre.

@KingMike Though I totally agree with your criticisms of the SNES game, I have to say I still had a wonderful time with it (warts and all). For someone into gaming at the time, there weren’t many options to immerse yourself into that universe. I do recall the soundtrack was excellent and atmosphere pretty solid. I was also really into the PC LOTR game released in the early 90s as well (the CD-ROM version had clips from the 1978 film).

I’d like the format of a pre-BOTW Zelda game. Meaning, it should have a lot of actual story and I wouldn’t mind some linearity (because storytelling necessitates some linearity).

Sorry to be "that guy" but it's Middle-earth, not Middle Earth. But yeah, what a neglected franchise in videogame terms. It's insane there isn't an Elder Scrolls type game or a Baldur's Gate type one, too. LotR basically created RPGs as we know them by way of inspiration for things like DnD. Hopefully the Amazon series changes that but with the way things are going with viewing figures and general reaction online, it's not looking good. It's getting a bit better though so maybe they can turn it around.

P.S. Gil-galad is Sauron in disguise. Mark my words. 😎

Tap here to load 39 comments

Hold on there, you need to login to post a comment...

Talking Point: What On Earth Is Going On With Square Enix?

We don't have enough gil!

Random: Unseen Screens Of Cut Super Mario 64 Stage Found In 1996 Nintendo Report

Footage Of Perfect Dark's Cut Feature 'Perfect Head' Emerges Online

Talking Point: Where Are All The Lord Of The Rings RPGs On Console?

Boil 'em, mash 'em, stick 'em in a RPG

Talking Point: What Do You Think Of The Harvestella Demo?

Is it a JRPG with farming, or a farm sim with JRPG elements?

30 Upcoming Nintendo Switch Games To Look Forward To In 2022

Pokémon GO Spotlight Hour Times: This Week's Featured Po...

Best Nintendo Switch Golf Games

Limited-Time Pokémon Sword And Shield Distribution Event...

Nintendo's Huge 'Blockbuster' Sale Ends This Weekend, Up ...

Talking Point: What On Earth Is Going On With Square Enix?

No Man Sky's 4.0 Update Will Be "Fully Focused" On The Ni...

Zelda: Tears Of The Kingdom: Everything We Know So Far

Splatoon 3 Splatfest - Time, Date, When's The Next Splatf...

Every Nintendo Switch Online Sega Genesis / Mega Drive Ga...

Where To Buy The Splatoon 3 Nintendo Switch OLED Model Co...

Join 1,345,282 people following Nintendo Life:

© 2022 Hookshot Media, partner of ReedPop. Hosted by 44 Bytes.